I build them, cost them out, and measure what they do once real users arrive.
that's me, Shreyan ✦
Built as backend infrastructure so the client can stand up voice AI customer support for any company that needs it. I costed it layer by layer before writing code, and the stack was chosen against that model rather than against a benchmark.
₹2.29 per minute, all in, at production quality. It is live and running.
read in detail →₹2.29 at ₹95/USD
The reported distress rate was climbing, 21 percent to 27 percent year over year, and it read like a market signal. It was 187 spurious labels from companies that had simply not filed their accounts. I traced it to the label definition rather than to the model, and added a reportability gate that holds the rate inside a point.
92.155% on current-year distress flagging ✦ SHAP attached to every prediction
read in detail →A facilities management platform was paying a vendor copilot to answer questions about their own data badly. I modelled the unit economics layer by layer before writing code: the cheapest model for intent routing, semantic table selection so only relevant schemas reach the LLM, three tiers of cache.
₹95,000 to ₹35,000 a month ✦ post-deployment spend tracked the model
read in detail →developers across nine coding tools
A tool-agnostic memory layer that learns a developer's habits from real edits and writes them into whichever coding agent they are using. One thousand and sixty-seven tests across sixty-six files, twelve of them security suites, after a hardening sprint that closed symlink races, Unicode sanitiser bypass and indirect prompt injection.
eleven stars ✦ security audit public in the repo
Twenty-six executed notebooks and thirty-eight unsolved problems across four tiers, some deliberately set as traps where the expected answer is that the quantum method loses. On the Wisconsin breast cancer set a classical SVM takes 96.25 percent in under a millisecond while the best quantum kernel takes 95 percent in twelve seconds.
MIT ✦ running since december 2024
How durable text watermarks actually are under regeneration. The repository carries an explicit note on use citing EU AI Act Article 50(2).
Choose an agent architecture before you build it, not after benchmarking.
A computational theory that characterises an agentic workflow by the intrinsic difficulty of the task and the complexity signature of the architecture. Signatures derived for four machine families with matching lower bounds, and reconciled against ten production workflows.
33 pages ✦ four complete case studies ✦ one documented failure case
read the paper →
A framework for building and deploying agentic systems responsibly in the Indian context.
A book chapter on where quantum machine learning actually earns its cost against classical baselines.
Springer Nature, with Soujanya Ray ✦ ISEM vol 65, pages 205 to 233 ✦ first online september 2025
A practitioner's handbook on building AI systems that can be governed, audited and explained.
Eighty-six pages, free to read, on Kindle ✦ version 1.0, january 2026
A certification framework for responsible AI, proposing how Indian AI systems could be audited and labelled before deployment.
Sent to MeitY and NASSCOM ✦ policy draft v2, 2026
I run every experiment myself before writing it up.
claude developers india ✦ 600+ builders
I founded the Claude India Developers WhatsApp Community, India and build the community with high engagements around it. I run events called "Show Your Products, Brainstorm and Validate" that bring people onto online calls and let them showcase their products to each other and get feedback. We also get amazing speakers for the event and deliver a lecture or two.
I also mentor at hackathons, most recently Code Wizards 2.0 at SRM University, Ghaziabad Campus.

the crew, after Claude event ✎

mentoring at Code Wizards 2.0 ✎

one bug, two heads ✎

at NASSCOM ✎

name tags on, still talking ✎

the hallway track ✎
Three questions, answered in a paragraph each.
I read the system, the logs and the data before forming an opinion.
The bottlenecks, the cause of each, and what I would change.
Built by me, or handed over with enough detail to build.
Checked against production spend and production behaviour.
Answer these and I will know within a paragraph whether I am the right person for you. It goes straight to my inbox, nothing else.
Prefer to talk first?
Message me on WhatsApp.
Three questions and I will tell you whether it is worth a call.
